XXXXXXXXX consequences XXXX as XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX be XXXXXXXXX due XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX testimony. XXX death XXXXXXX needs to XX abolished XXXXXXX statistics prove that our memory XX XXX XXXXX enough to XXXXX someone as 100% guilty. XXXX’s why DNA testing XXX XXXXXXXX is also important. XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXXX XXXX has a XXXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX’ decision XXX XXX potentially XXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX, some XXXXXX XXXXXX rely on XXXXXXXXXX testimony to XXXX a conclusion XXXXX the XXXXXXXXXX XXXX. An XXXXXXX, being XXX wrongful XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX Griffin, which XXX a case solely impacted by XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX executions. Authorities have released XXXX 17 XXXXXXX after XXX findings XXXXXXX XX wrongful XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX to XXXX XXXXXXXX, 4.1% XX XXXXXXX punishment XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. So this means out of XXXX cases XXXXXX 120 XXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX (Drehle). Imagine a loved one, a XXXXXX or XXXX you awaiting capital XXXXXXXXXX XXX a XXXXX you XXXX’t commit.
XXXXX XXXXX
XXXXXXXX, XXX, XXX Scott XXXXXXXXXXX. "Why XXXXXXX XXXXX Us Not XX XXXX XX Eyewitness
XXXXXXXX." Scientific American Global RSS. Scientific XXXXXXXX, X XXX. 2008. Magazine XXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXX, R. R., Deffenbacher, X. and XXXXXXX, J. (1987) XXXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXXX hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied XXXXXXXXXX, XX, 691-XXX.
"Death Penalty Focus:XXXXX." XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX:Facts. 2013. XXX.
Drehle, David XXX. "The U.S. May Have X XXX of Innocent XXXXXX on
XXXXX Row." XXXX. XXXX, 28 Apr. XXXX. XXX.
"Did XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX an XXXXXXXX XXX?" XXXXX.com. Associated
Press, 12 XXXX 2005. XXX.
"Eyewitness Identification Problems & Procedures | XXX." California Innocence Project. Web.
"Eyewitness Identification." XXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX Law XXX Criminology (1973-) XX.X (XXXX): 526-32. EBook.
"The Eyewitness XXXX." The Eyewitness Test. Web.