Volume 34 Number 1 Month/Year XXXX
Title XX XXXXXXX: Enter the quagmire–XXX XXXXXXXXXXX relationship between XXXX XXXXXXXXXX law XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX.
XXXXXX Addressed: Consumer XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX
XXXXXX(s): Svantesson, XXX Jerker X.
XXXXXXXX/XXXXXXX: The relationship XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX laws and data XXXXXXXXXX XXXX.
XXXXXXX:
XXX XXXXXX, in this XXXXXXX, studies XXX relationship between XXXX protection law XXX consumer XXXXXXXXXX law in the XXXXXXX of the XX’s online XXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXX’s main argument is that XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX and consumer XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXX perceived XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX, the reality XX XXXX XXXX protection XXXX XXX limit XXX effectiveness XX XXXXXXXX protection law. XXX XXXXXX supports XXXX XXXXX the argument that consumer protection law mainly sets a minimum XXXXXXXXXX level, or XXXXX, in the XXXXXXXXXX XX consumers, XXXXX data XXXXXXXXXX sets both a minimum XXX maximum acceptable level XXX legal data use XX XXXX protection XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX the XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXX and XXX free XXXXXXXX of data. XXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX the XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX consumer and data XXXXXXXXXX XXXX such XX the General XXXX Protection Regulation (XXXX) in the XX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX regulatory uncertainty, does XXX provide a XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX violations, and XXXX XXX XXXXXXX clear XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX correct course XX XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXX liability claims are XXXXXXX XXXXXXX third parties under consumer XXXXXXXXXX law. The XXXXXX ends with a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX any data XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX filed XXXXXXX XXXXX party XXXXXXXXXXX of XXXX such as XXXXXXXX should balance XXXX XXXXXXXX protection XXX data XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX, and should address XXXX areas XXXX XX Facebook Fan XXXXX XXX the Facebook Like Button.
Critique:
I agree XXXX the author’s XXXXXXXXXX XXXX data protection XXXX and consumer protection XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX in XXXXXXXX. However, XX the XXXXXXXX of studies such as XXXXX (XXXX) demonstrate, data protection and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX in alignment, and major stakeholders XXXX as XXXXX XXXXX data controllers tend XX XXX in the assumption that XXX interests XX both XXXXX of laws are in concordance. Hence, Svantesson’s framework XXX XXX XX practical for XXXXXXXXXXXXXX when considering the XXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX between data protection and XXXXXXXX protection law.
References (APA XXXXXX):
XXXXX, X. (XXXX). XXXXXX XXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX data protection through XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX law. Internet Policy Review, X(1), 1-15.
Svantesson, X. J. X. (2018). Enter XXX XXXXXXXX–the XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX data protection law and consumer XXXXXXXXXX XXX. Computer XXX & security review, 34(X), 25-36.