Volume 34 Number 1 Month/Year XXXX
Title of Article: XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX–the XXXXXXXXXXX relationship XXXXXXX data XXXXXXXXXX law and XXXXXXXX protection XXX.
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX: Consumer XXXXXXXXXX and the law
Author(s): Svantesson, XXX Jerker X.
Question/XXXXXXX: The relationship XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX laws and XXXX XXXXXXXXXX laws.
XXXXXXX:
XXX author, in XXXX article, XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX protection law and consumer protection XXX in the XXXXXXX XX XXX EU’s XXXXXX ecosystem. XXX author’s main XXXXXXXX is XXXX XXXXX XXXX protection XXX consumer protection laws are often XXXXXXXXX to be XXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX reality XX XXXX XXXX protection XXXX may limit XXX effectiveness XX consumer protection law. XXX XXXXXX supports this using XXX XXXXXXXX that XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX mainly XXXX a minimum XXXXXXXXXX level, or XXXXX, in the protection of XXXXXXXXX, XXXXX data XXXXXXXXXX sets XXXX a minimum XXX maximum XXXXXXXXXX level for XXXXX XXXX use XX XXXX protection XXXXXXXX with both XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX the free XXXXXXXX of data. The author then XXXXXXXXX the fact that XXXXXXXXXXXX consumer and data XXXXXXXXXX XXXX such as XXX General XXXX Protection Regulation (XXXX) in XXX XX places suffers from XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX not provide a clear mechanism XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX violations, XXX XXXX not XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX the correct course of XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXX protection-XXXXX XXXXXXXXX claims XXX pursued XXXXXXX third parties XXXXX consumer protection XXX. The XXXXXX XXXX with a tentative framework that any XXXX protection claims XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX party controllers XX data XXXX as XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX protection XXX data XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXX XXXXXX address grey XXXXX such XX XXXXXXXX Fan Pages and XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX Button.
Critique:
I agree XXXX the author’s assessment XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX laws XXX consumer XXXXXXXXXX laws XXX occasionally XX in conflict. XXXXXXX, as XXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX as Rhoen (XXXX) demonstrate, XXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXX, XXX major XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX third party XXXX controllers XXXX XX act in XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX interests of XXXX types XX XXXX are in XXXXXXXXXXX. Hence, XXXXXXXXXX’s XXXXXXXXX may XXX be practical XXX implementation when XXXXXXXXXXX XXX nuances in the relationship between data protection and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX.
References (XXX XXXXXX):
XXXXX, M. (2016). Beyond XXXXXXX: improving data protection XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX. XXXXXXXX Policy XXXXXX, X(1), 1-15.
XXXXXXXXXX, X. J. X. (2018). XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX–the complicated relationship XXXXXXX XXXX protection XXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX law. XXXXXXXX XXX & security XXXXXX, XX(X), XX-36.