Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Ask
Answer Questions
Answer
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
Business management case study
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
PepsiCo CEO India Nooyi should be given an excellent grade for her job performance in her role as a strategic leader.This is because Nooyi has been responsible for a number of strategic initiatives at PepsiCo which have allowed the company to leverage new disruptive trends, such as a greater push toward sustainability and healthy food, to drive strong growth that has surpassed that of their competitors. Foremost, Nooyi was able to push PepsiCo to embrace sustainability, health and employee development as a strategic direction. The 2006 PepsiCo strategy motto, ‘Performance with Purpose’, allowed Pepsico to focus on its talent development initiatives to improve employee engagement, and encourage the company to reduce the carbon footprint of its operations, production and supply chain activities. This allowed PepsiCo to surpass Coca Cola, as shown by PepsiCo’s outperformance of Coca Cola by 63.4% in normalised stock performance over 2012 to 2017, compared to Coca-Cola’s 14.72% over the same period.This strategic push was also aligned with major initiatives by leading Fortune 500 companies, such as McDonalds, Apple and GM, to improve their sustainability and health related initiatives.</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">I would rate Nooyi XX possessing Level 5 XXXXXXXXXX. Jim XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX 5 leadership XX a XXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX involves a XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX of humility and XXXX. Leaders XXXX ‘Level X XXXXXXXXXX’ XXXXXX have XXX humility to XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX or reform a company’s course XX action XXXX it is off XXXXX, XXX XX XXXX XXX will to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX even when XXXX XXX perceived as XXXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX opinion. XXXXXXX XXXXXXX, XXXXX XXXX beyond a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX (level X) XX XX an effective Level 4 leader. XXX demonstrates some XXXX, XXXXXXX courageous XXXXXXXXX such XX XXX spin off XXXX XXXX, XXXXX Hut, XXX XXX in XXXX, XXX the acquisition Tropicana and XXXXXX XXXX in 1998 - XXXX. XXXXXXX, XXXXX has yet to fully XXXXXXXXXXX a transformative approach XX how PepsiCo operates. XXXXX the XXXXXXX has taken a triple XXXXXX line approach and a XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX, XX well XX a XXXXX on human/XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX and employee XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX has XXXX back from bolder XXXXXXXXX XXXX XX the XXXXX XX the PepsiCo XXXXXXXXXXX into 2 XXXXXXXX entities XXX to fears of XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX to its XXXXXXXX structure XXX its employees. XXXXX, in XXXX regard, Nooyi XXX be assessed XX XX quite XXXXXXXXXXXX</span><span class="XX">. Furthermore, XXX XXXX </span><span class="XX">XXXX not XXXXXXX engagement with XXXXXXXXXXXX such XX NGOs and sustainability XXXXXXXXX, which suggests XXXX XXXXX XXX not have XXX humility XX XXXXXX XXXX them XXXXXXXXXXX.</span></p> <p></p> <p>Question 2</p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">X. Strategic XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX abandon XXXXX visions XXXXXX because XXXXX visions XX not XXXX to XXXX XX an immediate (financial) competitive XXXXXXXXX. Instead, XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX following XXXXXXX in order XX assess XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX with XXXXX XXXXXXX visions. Foremost, strategic leaders XXXXXX conduct financial projections XXX a strategic analysis of XXX XXXXXX using tools such as SWOT XXXXXXXX. XX XXXXX XXXXX’s XXXX, it may have been XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX reasons for XXX PepsiCo XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Coca-XXXX XX a XXXX XXXXXX XXXXX implementing the Performance XXXX Purpose strategy. XXXX XXX have XXXX because the XXXXXXXXXXX from XXX strategy XXX have caused a XXX in cash XXXX and revenues, XXXXX XXXXX XXXX recovered at a later time XXXXXX, or XXXXXXX of a seasonal XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX product XXXXXXX. XX XX XXXXXXXXX for strategic XXXXXXX XX not XXXXXXX XXXXX strategies XXXXXX due to XXXXXXXXX setbacks. XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX should</span><span class="s2"> e</span><span XXXXX="XX">XXXXX stakeholders XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX views, and XXXX to XXXXXX a majority XX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX convinced XXX XXXXXXXXXX of the vision of XXX strategic leader. Finally, XXXXXXXXX leaders XXXXXX </span><span class="s2">h</span><span XXXXX="XX">old fast XX XXXXX strategy XXX only consider XXXXXXXXXXX revisions, such XX XXXXXXX XX PepsiCo’s XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, based XX XXXXXXXXX evidence. In Nooyi’s case, it XXX clear XXXX her Performance with XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX off in XXX long-XXXX, XX XXXXX XX PepsiCo’s outperformance of XXXX XXXX XX XX.X% in XXXXXXXXXX stock performance over 2012 to 2017, XXXXXXXX XX Coca-Cola’s XX.72% over XXX same XXXXXX.If Nooyi had pulled out of XXX strategy prematurely, it is XXXXXXXX XXXX PepsiCo XXXXX XXXX performed XX XXXX as it XXXXXXXXXX XXX.</span></p> <p></p> <p>XXXXXXXX 3</p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">3. I XXXXX that ‘XXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXX are intimately XXXXXX’, for a XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX. Foremost, XX XXXXXXXX on XXX XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX XXX given XXXXX license to XXXXXXX. Companies XXXX need XX show that they are XXXXXXX driven XX serve a specific market XXXX, which, in PepsiCo’s case, may be nutritious, delicious and fun XXXX. Furthermore, to XXXXXX XXXXX license to operate, XXXXXXXXX must XXXX XX mindful XX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX of XXXXX operations on XXXXXX XXXX as XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, carbon footprint, labor XXXXXXXXX and land use. XXXXX, companies must XX clear about their purpose and XXXXXXX in order to fill a specific XXXXXX niche and preserve their license to operate. Secondly, XXXXXXX needs XX focus XX its purpose to XXXXXXXX its XXXXXXXXXX compliance, XXX to XXXXXX XXXX it continues to focus XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX production that is of XXXXX to society, in XXXXXXXXXX XXXX existing laws and XXXXXXXXXXX governing XXX XXXXXXXXXX. Thirdly, XXXXXXX, XX XXXXXXXX XX its XXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX responsibility XXX XXXXXXXXXXX production initiatives, XXXX be able XX bolster its XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. Fourthly, XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX attending to XXX XXXXXXX rather than profit, XXXX be able to XXXXXXXXXX a sound XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XX drive its profitability. XXXXXXX, a strong brand identity built XXXXXX PepsiCo’s purpose would allow the company XX differentiate itself in an increasingly diverse XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX fast moving consumer goods.</span></p> <p></p> <p>Question X</p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">X. Future growth for PepsiCo should be XXXXXX by XXX following XXXXXX areas. XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX should XXXXXX to XXX need XXX XXXXXXX customisation in emerging markets. As markets such XX XXXXX and India continue to XXXX in market XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX, XXXXXXX XXXX need to question whether its existing XXXXXXX offerings and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX are XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX in XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. Secondly, XXXXXXX XXXXXX drive XXXXXX XX tapping on innovative XXXXXXXX such as XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX milks, as XXXX as alternative XXXXXXXXXX and natural XXXXXXXX. XX consumers XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX aware of the XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXXX dairy XXX XXXXX-fat products, XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX its existing XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX to invest heavily in these XXXXXXXXXXX innovative products. Finally PepsiCo should invest heavily in vertical XXXXXXXXXXX efforts such XX XXX farm to table movement, which XXXXX allow XXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX across its supply chain.</span></p> <p></p> <p>Question 5</p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="s1">X. XXX idea behind the strategy XX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX divisions, XXXX XXX focusing on XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX XX snack XXXXX, XX XXXXXXXX on XXX notion XXXX autonomous XXXXXXXXX would be able XX specialise and perform more XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXX XXXXXXXX would XXXXXX add XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX consumers, XXX maybe not XXX environment.The XXXXXXXX XXXXX add XXXXX for shareholders as it would likely raise XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX, as each autonomous division XXXXX be able XX specialise more XXXXXXXXXXX in marketing and product development to XXXXXX XXXXX to XXXXXXXX market segments. However, in XXX short XXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX may have XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX in share XXXXX and XXXXXXXXX as the company XXXX XX adversely affected by restructuring in XXX XXXXX XXXX. The XXXXXXXX should XXXX add XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX as it XXXXX XXXXXX in more targeted XXXXXXXX.<span XXXXX="Apple-converted-XXXXX"></span></span><span XXXXX="s2"> XXXXXXX, XXX strategy XX XXXXXXXX XX have XXX impact on XXX environment, as it would not XXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX business XXXXXXXXXX.</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
