It is worth XXXXXXXXXXXXX that former XXXXXX XXX indeed benefit from legislation XXX XXXXXXXXX such XX XXX Civil Rights Bill of 1866, which XXXXXXX that no state XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX separate a citizen XXXX the right XX create XXXXXXXXX, lawsuits or XXXXX their own XXXXXXXX XXXXXX. However, a XXXXXXXXXXXX veto meant that these initiatives XXXXXX, XXX that XXXXXX XXXXXX continued to be deprived of ownership XXX rights in XXXXX XXXX as XXXXXXXX, political participation XXX employment. This XXX be XXXXXXXX by document 95, the XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX residents of Nashville, who wanted XXX XXXXX to XXXX but were XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXX.
In conclusion, XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX Robert Richardson's comments in XXXX did XXXXXX XXXX out to XX prescient, as the XXXXXXXXXXX slaves XXXX XXXXX limited rights in the XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX in XXX areas of limited XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX marriage and XXXXXX to XXXXXX, XXX were heavily limited in other areas XXXXXXX discriminatory legislation XXXX XX XXX Black Codes and XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX attitudes and laws XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. Decades after the end XX XXX Civil XXX, XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX disenfranchised, poor, and XXXXXXX property, XXXXX would XXXXXXX a resurgent push for civil rights later in the XXXX XXXXXXX.