X) Is it XXXXX?
2) XX it XXXXXXXX?
X) XXX does it XXXX me XXXX?
X) Is it XXXXX? In XXX ‘XXXX of Janet K. and XXXXXXXX’ it XX important XX decide XXXXXXX the termination of XXX Janet is XXXXXXX? XX the answer is XX then probably it XXX't a good XXXX. XXX point XX XXXX it's XXXXXXXXX. XXXXX XXXXX caused XXX XXXXXXXXXX to XXX XXXXXXXX therefore it XX XXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX Janet. It is unfair XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX her XXX after XXXXXXX about her disorder completely. Although, it is unfair, XXXXXXX it XX XXXXX to terminate her.
2) XX it balanced? If it is legal then XXXX question is XX ask; whether is it balanced? XX XXXXX XXXX you in determining if someone is negatively impacted by a XXXXXXXXX. Although in XXX XXXXXXX case XXX termination XX XXXXX XXX a XXXXX reason that XXX XXXX have the XXXXXXX every XXXXX, this would XXXXX affect XXX hospital, XXX Janet feelings would get XXXXXXXX. Hence, XXX action hurts XXX individual XXX so it is not balanced.
X) How does it make me feel? If I XXX not XXXX right doing XXXXXXXXX I do not XXXXX that I would XX it. It is XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXX tend XX be XXXX emotional than males and it could affect a person XXXXXXXXXXX and physically. In XXXXX XXXX XXX is XXXXXXXX because XX her termination. XXX hospital can XXXX the name XX XXX hospital by XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX J. However, it XXXX hurt XXXXXX X XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX, it XX obvious that XXX XXXXXXXXX of "the XXXX XX XXXXX X. XXX Epilepsy" through the XXXXX-XXXX XXXXXX Model, the XXXXX decision XX XXXXXXX.
Conclusion
In XXX XXXXX case since, Janet’s XXXXXXXX XXXXX bring a XXX XXXXXXXXXX to XXX XXXXXXXX; therefore physician XXX XXXXXXX in XXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX her. Although it hurts the feelings XX XXXXXX X, the XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX (XXXXXXX, 2016).
XXXXXXXXXX
Herring,X. (XXXX).XXXXXXX Law XXX XXXXXX. XXX XXXX, NY: Oxford XXXXXXXXXX Press.