Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Answer Questions
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
Case and comparative studies
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 150%;" lang="EN-US"> In the article written by Greiner we find out about a complex link between cattle raiding, ethnical conflicts and political involvement. The author brings us detailed information about the current situation and the historical background about this fact. According to this article, we can say that cattle raiding has been a criminal activity before the foundation of now days Kenya. Such actions have been emerging since the colonial times. Political interventions modified only their intensity and modus operandi. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 150%;" lang="EN-US"> Criminal activity is the way to react for most tribes during the ethnical conflicts between them. Beyond this form of assault and intimidation between neighbors, politicians funded the election campaigns from money earned from this criminal activity. In the last 20 years the raids evolved from old methods to a modern approach. Some bands use modern military equipment. Most of the money earned from selling the stolen veil is spent on new military equipment. The firearms are used also in raids upon villages lived by other ethnic groups than the attackers. The struggle is getting more complex XX pastoral XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX. XX XXXX about the privatization process XXX agricultural XXXXXXXXXX, new wildlife conservation areas and rapid XXXXXXXXXX growth. Authorities try XXXXXXXXXXXX to redraw the inside XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX regions. In this XXX XXXX XXXXXXX to isolate XXXXXX groups XXXXXXX XXXX in order XX XXXXXXX new XXXXXXXXX. XXXXX with XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXX soil XXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX in Kenya. Farming XXX related criminal activity are the main sources of XXXXX for politicians. Even XXXXX row leaders come XXXX farmers or criminal XXXXXXXXXXXXX related between XXXX. </span></p> <p class="XXXXXXXXX" style="line-XXXXXX: 150%;"><span style="font-XXXX: XX.0pt; XXXX-XXXXXX: 150%;" lang="XX-XX"> XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX on a single XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX in a detailed way XXX link XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX that caused XXX current XXXXXXXXX. XXX point of view XX that a XXXXXXXX or positive situation XXXXXX XX left alone in the context. Every XXXXX and XXXXXX are linked XXXXXXX. The effect tend XX XXXXX XXXXX effects in XXXXX XXXXX. Like in his XXXX, a XXXXXXXX activity is a source of XXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX XXX a XXXXXX of XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX for XXXXXX XXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX put a pressure XX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX brings XXXXXXX and XXXXXXX XXXXX back XX criminal XXXXXXXXXX. </span></p> <p XXXXX="XXXXXXXXX" style="XXXX-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 12.XXX; line-height: 150%;" lang="XX-US"> XXXXXXX aims for intrinsic purpose as XXX case XX XXXX-standing. It XXXXXXX an XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXX complex to apply in XXXXX fields of XXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX. The particularities XXX XXXXXX. In the case analyzed XX Greiner, XXXXXXXXXX would XXX have XXXX so efficient. Every XXXXXX group has its own XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Understanding XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX help XXXXXXXXXX the conflict from XXX XXXXX. He XXXXXXX to XXXX XXXXXX bringing their opinion about the XXXXXXX. We XXXX out this way XXXX XX have a de-facto federal XXXXX XXXX a weak government. The XXXXXXXX comes XXXX XXX vicious XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXX welfare XXX XXXXXXXXXXX than XXXXXXXX growth. XXXXXXXX XXXXXX can not XXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX. Agriculture is the base of XXXXX XXXXXXX. XX the agriculture XX XXXXXXXX by criminal activities this XXXXXX XXXXXXXX investors or developers. All XXXXX details could not XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX if XXXXXXX XXXX a comparison between similar situations. XX XXX XXXX the details XXX bringing XXX XXXXXXXXXX. </span></p> <p XXXXX="MsoNormal" style="line-height: XXX%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 150%;" lang="EN-US"> XXXXXXXXXXX’s XXXXXXX XX making a compared analysis between XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX in the way they implemented Human Rights Policy during the XXXX 50 XXXXX. XXX main objective of XXX XXXXXXX is XX prove the strongest motivations XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX comply national laws XXXX XXXXX Rights Convention. With comparative XXXXXXXX we XXX XXXX out how XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXX or XXXXXXX changes in their XXXXXXXX XXXX. XX XXXXXXXXX back then and also XXXXX, every state XXXXX XXXXXX for breaking XXXXX rights is XXXXX XX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. The first XX XX provide XXXXXXXXX reparations XX XXX XXXXXXX, XXX second XX to XXXX symbolic XXXXXXXX that honor XXX XXXXXX and recognize XXXXX pledging for public XXXXXXXXX. The XXXX two XXXXXXXX XXXXX XX juridical effects XXXX XX punishing XXX XXXXXXXXXXX for XXX fault XXX taking measures XX assure XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX would XXX permit a XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX in the XXXXXX. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="XXXX-height: XXX%;"><span style="XXXX-XXXX: 12.XXX; line-height: XXX%;" lang="EN-XX"> XXX compared XXXXXXXX take a XXXXXXXXXXXXX view of how states have XXXXXXX XXXXXX a XXXXXX XX time in XXX XXXXX rights matter. We XXXX out that Argentina XXXX an XXXXXXXXX transition from military dictatorship XX XXXXXXXXX. XX abolished the XXXXXXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXXXXXXX to military XXXXXXXXX and made great XXXXXXX XXX compliance XXXX human XXXXXX. XXXXXXX were made XXXXXXXXXX after XXX economic crisis at XXX beginning of 2000s. XXXXX trade partners of XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in treaties XXX human XXXXXX XXXXX in order XX XXXXXXXX business. Columbia XXX a XXXXX resistance to change but it also XXXXXXX to XXXXX laws XX enforce human rights. XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX is still XXXX and XXX process XXXXX a lot XX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX conflicts. XXXX if XXX XXXXXXX Court XXX a more XXXXXXXXXXX XXX, XXX Government and Legislature XXX a XXX of corrupt members. XXXX XXXX interested in XXXXXXX XXX XXX way XX acting. Brazil XX the XXXX example and we XXXX about a XXXXXXX that XXX XXX comply yet with the human XXXXXX pack. XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX high for XXX XXX political force. </span></p> <p XXXXX="XXXXXXXXX" style="XXXX-XXXXXX: 150%;"><span style="font-size: XX.XXX; line-height: XXX%;" lang="EN-US"> The XXXXXX considers that in XXX his XXXXXXXX, XXX main XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXX XXX political XXXX XXX possible advantages in XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXX. XX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX cases in order XX seek XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX them. XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXX handling of XXX XXXXX, the XXXX decisional XXXXXXX are the same. XXX link between XXX XXXXXXXX force XXX XXXXXXXXXX is common in XXX three examples as XXXX XXXX back their countries compliance XX human XXXXXX law. </span></p> <p XXXXX="MsoNormal" style="XXXX-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; XXXX-XXXXXX: XXX%;" lang="XX-US"> Finding similarities helped XXXX XXX big XXXXXXX. He applied XXX method XX extrapolation so we can XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX in other XXXXXX from XXXXX continents. XXXX XX why XXXXXXXXXXX&XXXXX;s approach XX in XXXXXXXXXXXX purpose. He XX XXXX concerned in XXX matter XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. The XXXXXXXXX he found functioning badly or with a XXXXX XXXXX XXX XX available in all the countries when it comes XX comply with XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX. XXX difference XX made XX the democratization grade or XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX XXXX seek XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX or reputation XXXX tend more XX XXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX they sign; XXXX if the new XXXXX XXX XXX easy to apply in XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX because XX internal conflicts or XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX!</span></p> <p XXXXX="XXXXXXXXX" style="line-height: XXX%;"><span style="font-XXXX: 12.XXX; XXXX-XXXXXX: 150%;" XXXX="XX-XX"> XXXX XXXXXXXXXX was more easy XX make XXXX the help XX country comparisons. XXX case he XXXXXXX XXXXXXX with a XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX with XXXXXXXXXX evolution XXX XXXXX XXXX a XXXXXX conclusion. XX XXXXX three countries XXXXXXX in theory and public speech to implement XXXXX rights in XXXXXXXX law packs. XXX author XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX resistance XXX XXXXXX in this process. XXXX XX the countries had set XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX in the XXXXXXXXXXXXX convention they XXXXXX, XXXX did XXX respect each others promise in a full way. Despite XX XXXXXXXX problems, the external view was the same: the XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX and XXX lack XX XXXXXXXXX will.</span></p> <p XXXXX="MsoNormal" style="line-height: XXX%;"><span style="font-XXXX: XX.0pt; line-height: XXX%;" XXXX="EN-US"> XXXX XX XXX focusing XX a single XXXX would XXXX not XXXXXX him in making a XXXXX. Human Rights XXX an international XXXXXXX XXX XXXX must XX treated XXXX way. XXX states must comply XXXX these universal rules. All states XXXXXXXXXX this XXXXX must diplomatically XXXXX the XXX-complying ones XX make progress XXX XXXXX XXX same approach and objective.</span></p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
