Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Ask
Answer Questions
Answer
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
Television Discussion for Communications Class
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
1.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Televisions influence on the general public has changed very little over the past fifty years. While just as influential toady the type of influence has changed greatly. In the 1950s, 1960s and even in the 1970s and early 1980s there was a reliance on three networks and maybe one or two locally owned stations programming. Having such a small body of programming to choose XXXX limited XXX amount of topics XXXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX either XXXX or XXXXXXXXXXXXX formats. Additionally XXXXX topics were harshly scrutinized XX network executives and an XXXXXX body XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX. With XXX XXXXXXXX XX cable, satellite and XXXX internet XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX programming the XXXXXX XX topics XXXXXXXXX today XX seemingly endless. So XXXXX the programs XXXXXXXXX today are just XX XXXXXXXXXXX as ever it XXXXX seem XXXXX XXXXXXX impact XX society as a XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX. With a XXXXXXX XXXXXX of options XXXXXX XXXX to XXXXX the news XXX XXXXXXXXXX programs that XXX their XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX viewership XX one XXXXXXXXXX program, or point XX view. XX a sense the XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX choose may be XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX XXXX programming tends XX XXXXX a population XXXX really XXXXXX require very much XXXXXXXXX in XXX first XXXXX.</p> <p XXXXX="XXXXXXXXX">2.</p> <p></p> <p class="XXXXXXXXX">XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXX nature of television programming was very XXXXXXX XXX apparent. Many XXXXXXXX XX XXX time XXXXXXX a XXXX specific XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX stated and even XXXX XXXX XXXXXXX was an XXXXXXXXX of the XXXXX it XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX as a XXXXXXXX problem XXXXX XXX was resolved by XXX end XX XXX episode. Today it seems the actual meaning XX XXX program is a bit more muddled. XXXX news XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX week-long XXX XXXXXXXXX month-XXXX XXXXXXX that XXXX all sorts of XXXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX XXX way. Sometimes a XXXX conclusion XX never XXXXXXX leaving the viewer XX interrupt their own meaning. People today XXXX XX XXXXX programming XXXX XXXX their XXXXXX XXX standards as XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX so greatly XXXX XXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX. A XXX of XXXXXXXXXX programming XXXXX is XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX and has no intention of XXXXXX any XXXXXXX behind entertaining XXX XXXXXX. XX XXXXXX XX a XXXXXXXXXX program has meaning based on our own preexisting ideas how deeply XX XXXXXXXX XXXXX individual XXXXXX XXX XXXXX in the XXXXXXXXXXX we choose XX watch. There is very XXXXXX "XXXXXX of the XXXXX" programming available today XX XXX creators of XXX XXXXXXXXXXX in XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX to XXX step XX XXX XXXXXX or individuals morals.</p>">
