Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Answer Preview
- In MLA style, each entry begins at the left margin; subsequent lines indent 1/2 “ (or five spaces)
- The annotation begins on a new line and is indented 1/2” (or five spaces)
- Orlov interprets the source’s findings in relation to other sources in the bibliography.
- XXXXXX-XXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX, with XX extra space XXXXXXX XXXXXXX and XX XXXXX XXXXX between XXXXXXX and their XXXXXXXXXXX
- Annotations XXX XXXXXXX XXX-150 XXXXX
- XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXX for an online source
- XXXXXXX is XXXXXXXX by a XXXXXXXX evaluation XX XXX XXXXXX
X. The screencast in XXXX week’s discussion XXXXX with XXXXXXX of how to research XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX databases XXXX as the XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX and EBSCOHost. XXXXXXXX, XX should limit search XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX to find XXX most XXXXXXXX sources quickly. XXX XXXXXXX, the speakers XXXXXX XX XXXX XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX light XX cancer XXXXXXXXXX , XXX used XXXXX terms to find the most relevant XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXX, XX XXXXXX XXXX out for XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, such as XXXXX XXXXXXX by XX.X.s for the general XXXXXX, or those XXXX citations XX XXXXX sources XXXX as XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, we should use an article’s bibliography to obtain leads for other XXXXXXX, because scholarly articles often XXXXXXX lists of XXXXX works XXXXX. This allows us to find more resources on the causes XXX XXXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXX at XXXX.
X. X scholarly source is different XXXX other XXX-scholarly XXXXXXX based XX XXX XXXXXX’s XXXXXX, XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX, XXXXX of topic XXX XXXXXXXXX. Foremost, XXX writer of a XXXXXXXXX source is often a scholar or XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX will XX an XXXXXX in their academic field, whose work is peer-reviewed XXX based on XXXXXXXXXXX rigorous research. XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXX XX a scholarly source XXXXX XXX a XXXXXX quality XX evidence XXXX other XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX tabloids, news articles and other informal XXXXXXXXXXXX. This is XXXXXXX XXX writers of a XXXXXXXXX source XXX XXXXX subject XX XXXXXXX by XXXXX XXXXX XXX the XXX XX industry-standard XXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, XX prove XXXX XXXXX findings are independently verifiable XXX reliable. Thirdly, the XXXXX XX the XXXXX is XXXXX fairly serious and narrowed, and are not XXXXX to appeal XX the XXXXXXX XXXXXX or XX XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, XXX scholarly source’s XXXXXXXXX will often be XXXX credible than those of another source, XX they typically XXXX other established precedent XXXXX or XXXXX peer-XXXXXXXX scholarly XXXXXXXX.
">