Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Answer Questions
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
National and California Government
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
Week 5 Discussion: Presidential Authority, Executive Power and the role of Congress</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><br></p><p>Recent events concerning foreign military intervention and security have once again brought the issue of American presidential and executive authority into the spotlight. Trump's use of executive power to declare a national emergency on the U.S.-Mexican border due to the purportedly unchecked flow of undocumented immigrants into the United States has led critics on both the Democratic and Republican sides of Congress to denounce President Trump's actions as an abuse of presidential authority by a reckless president. On the other hand, supporters of President Trump argue that his use of executive power to act without the consent of a highly polarized XXXXXXXX in requisitioning funds to secure XXX XXXXXXXX border XXX been XXXXXX an XXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX with XXX duties XX act in the interests XX XXXXXXXX security. XXXX XXXXX will XXXXX that the Congressional interpretation XX XXXXXXX X, Section 1 XXX 2 XX correct, and that the President should XXXXXXXX the XXX XX XXXXXXXXX power to XXXXXXX XXXX XXX approved XXXX XXX XXXXXXX XX the Congress, in order XX XXXXXXX the situation XX an XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX that abuses XXXXXXXXXXXX authority for personal or XXXXXXXXX benefit.</p> <p>The main reasons why the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX restrict the XXX XX executive power to actions XXXXXXXX by Congress XXX to XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX design. Foremost, the XXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX three XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXXX, judicial and XXXXXXXXXXX, in order XXXX XXXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX would not arise XXXXX one branch is able to force its authority and interests, XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX the interests XX XXXXX branches. XXX framers XXXX XXXXX the three branches XX act in consistent XXXXXXXXXXX XXX consultation with XXXX other [X], with tools such XX the XXXXXXXXXX and the Congressional XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX used to ensure that XX single branch XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX over XXX XXXXX by force. XXXXXXXXXXX, in XXXXXXX XX national security, such as XXXXX involving border XXXXXXXX, foreign emergencies and XXX declaration XX war, XXXXX XXXXXX be a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX from both parties XXX all XXXXX branches of XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX XXXXX mean XXXX it should XX XXXXXXXXXX easy for XXX XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX from Congress XXXX issues of national XXXXXXXX. For the President XX XXX unilaterally, therefore, XXXXXXXX an XXXXX of power XXXX XXXXXXXX XXX principles XX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX that exist within the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXXX political institutions. [2] XXXXXXXXX Trump’s recent declaration of national emergency, as do XXXXXXXX unilateral XXXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, therefore constitute XXXXXX of presidential authority.</p> <p>XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX approval XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX actions in the XXXXXXXXX of XXX nation’s security prevents XXX President XXXX XXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX. This is XXXXXXX XXX President XX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXX partisan conflicts XXXX international XXXXXXXXX rivals. President XXXXX’s unilateral declaration XX a trade XXX with XXXXXXXXX Xi XXXXXXX of China XX one such partisan conflict, XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX economic XXXXX XX XXXX XXXXX. Furthermore, XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX’s executive authority extends XX XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX and commutations, the President could appoint or XXXXXX individuals XXX XXXXXXXX political XXXX, in a XXX that XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. [X] XXXXXXXXXX, by seeking Congressional approval for XXXX XXXXXXX, the President XXXXXXXX actions XXXX are construed XX tainted XX XXXXXXXXX XX interest.</p> <p>XX XXXXXXXXXX, XXX President should restrict XXX XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXX with XXX consent XX XXX Congress. Recent actions by the XXXXXXXXX XX the United XXXXXX have suggested XXXX XXXX norm is XXXXXXXXXXXX neglected in XXX present XXXXX Administration, and pose a XXXXX and present danger XXX the XXXXXXXXX XX American democracy.</p><p><XX></p><p>Word Count: XXX words</p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">Endnotes</span></p> <p><span class="XX">[1] XXXXXX, William. "XXXXXXXX, the President, and the XXX XXXXXX."<em>XXXXXXXXXX Law XXXXXX</em>59.X (1971).</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">[X] Mickey, XXXXXX, Steven XXXXXXXX, and XXXXX XXXXX XXX. "Is America XXXXX Safe XXX Democracy."<em>Foreign Affairs</em>(XXXX).</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="XX">[3] Ibid.<span XXXXX="Apple-converted-XXXXX"></span></span></p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">XXXXXXXXXX</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">Mickey, Robert, Steven XXXXXXXX, and XXXXX XXXXX XXX. "XX XXXXXXX Still Safe XXX Democracy."<em>XXXXXXX XXXXXXX</em>(XXXX).</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">XXXXXX, XXXXXXX. "Congress, XXX XXXXXXXXX, XXX the XXX Powers."<em>XXXXXXXXXX Law Review</em>XX.5 (XXXX).</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">Zakaria, Fareed. "XXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX Democracy."<em>XXXXXXX Affairs</em>XX.X (1997).</span></p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
