Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Ask
Answer Questions
Answer
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
National and California Government
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
Week 5 Discussion: Presidential Authority, Executive Power and the role of Congress</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><br></p><p>Recent events concerning foreign military intervention and security have once again brought the issue of American presidential and executive authority into the spotlight. Trump's use of executive power to declare a national emergency on the U.S.-Mexican border due to the purportedly unchecked flow of undocumented immigrants into the United States has led critics on both the Democratic and Republican sides of Congress to denounce President Trump's actions as an abuse of presidential authority by a reckless president. On the other hand, supporters of President Trump argue that his use of executive power to act without the consent of a highly polarized XXXXXXXX in requisitioning funds XX secure XXX XXXXXXXX border has been XXXXXX an action in XXXXXXXXXX with his XXXXXX to XXX in the interests of national XXXXXXXX. This essay XXXX XXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX interpretation XX Article 2, Section 1 and 2 XX correct, and XXXX the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX restrict XXX XXX of executive power XX XXXXXXX that are approved XXXX XXX XXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXXX, in order to XXXXXXX the situation of an unchecked president XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX.</p> <p>XXX XXXX XXXXXXX why the XXXXXXXXX should restrict the use XX executive power XX actions XXXXXXXX by Congress are to XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX design. XXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXX of XXX American XXXXXXXXXXXX created XXXXX XXXXXXXX XX government, XXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX, in order that XXXX branch XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX represent certain XXXXXXXXX, and XXX situation would XXX XXXXX where one XXXXXX is able to force its authority and XXXXXXXXX, unrestricted, over the XXXXXXXXX of other branches. The XXXXXXX also XXXXX the three branches XX act in consistent XXXXXXXXXXX XXX consultation XXXX each other [1], with XXXXX XXXX XX the filibuster and the Congressional and Presidential XXXXXX used XX XXXXXX XXXX XX single XXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX gain XXXXXXXXX XXXX the XXXXX by XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX, in matters XX national XXXXXXXX, such as XXXXX XXXXXXXXX border security, XXXXXXX emergencies and XXX declaration XX war, there should be a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX from XXXX XXXXXXX and XXX three branches of government, XXXXX would mean that it should XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX for XXX Presidency XX XXXXXX consensus XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX security. For XXX XXXXXXXXX to XXX unilaterally, XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX an abuse of power XXXX XXXXXXXX the principles of XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX that XXXXX within XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX political institutions. [X] President XXXXX’s recent declaration XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XX do XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX American presidents, therefore constitute XXXXXX XX presidential XXXXXXXXX.</p> <p>Furthermore, XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX approval XXX presidential XXXXXXX in the interests XX the XXXXXX’s XXXXXXXX prevents XXX President XXXX XXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX conflicts XX XXXXXXXX. XXXX is because XXX XXXXXXXXX is susceptible XX personal XXX XXXXXXXX conflicts XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX XXXXX’s unilateral declaration XX a XXXXX war with President XX XXXXXXX XX China is XXX such XXXXXXXX conflict, XXXXX has XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX economic XXXXX XX both sides. XXXXXXXXXXX, given XXXX the President’s XXXXXXXXX authority XXXXXXX to appointments, XXXXXXX and commutations, XXX President XXXXX XXXXXXX or pardon XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX political XXXX, in a XXX that harms XXXXXXXX security XXX American XXXXXXXXX. [X] Conversely, XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX for such actions, XXX President XXXXXXXX actions that are construed as tainted XX conflicts XX XXXXXXXX.</p> <p>XX XXXXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXXX should XXXXXXXX the XXX of executive XXXXX to actions that XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX of the Congress. XXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XXX President XX XXX United XXXXXX XXXX suggested XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX neglected in XXX present Trump Administration, and pose a XXXXX XXX present XXXXXX XXX the XXXXXXXXX of American XXXXXXXXX.</p><p><br></p><p>XXXX XXXXX: XXX words</p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">Endnotes</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="s1">[X] XXXXXX, William. "Congress, the President, and the XXX XXXXXX."<em>California Law Review</em>XX.X (1971).</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">[2] Mickey, Robert, XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, and Lucan Ahmad XXX. "XX XXXXXXX XXXXX Safe for Democracy."<em>Foreign XXXXXXX</em>(2017).</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="s1">[X] Ibid.<span class="XXXXX-converted-XXXXX"></span></span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="XX"></span> </p> <p><span class="XX">XXXXXXXXXX</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="s1">XXXXXX, XXXXXX, Steven XXXXXXXX, XXX Lucan XXXXX XXX. "Is America Still Safe XXX Democracy."<em>XXXXXXX Affairs</em>(2017).</span></p> <p><span class="s1"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="XX">XXXXXX, XXXXXXX. "XXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXXX, and the War Powers."<em>XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX</em>59.X (XXXX).</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p> <p><span class="XX">Zakaria, Fareed. "The XXXX of XXXXXXXXX Democracy."<em>XXXXXXX Affairs</em>76.6 (1997).</span></p> <p><span XXXXX="XX"></span> </p> <p><span XXXXX="s1"></span> </p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
