Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Answer Questions
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
need help in philosophy
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
<p>I agree XXXX XXXXXXX' argument that the intellectual XXXX XX the XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX with any XXXXXXXX, fixed properties. XX XX a mental XXXXXXX that is XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX mind, XXXXX on years and XXXXX XX past XXXXXXXXX that is XXXXXXX from XXXXXX XXXXXXXX. I XXXX XXXXXXX that anyone can XXXX XXX understand the nature of XXXXXXXX because our knowledge XX based on XXX same fundamental XXXXXXXXXX XXX values. This XXXXXXXX can almost XX XXXXXXXXX XX evolutionary in nature, XX the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX of life, but XXXXXXXXXX XX are all one, stemming XXXX a XXXXXXX XXXXXX. XX XXXXXXX a XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX activity to some XXXXXX, oftentimes XXXXXXXX by environmental XXXXXXX. Aquinas goes XX to further XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX from animals based on XXXXX levels XX understanding, XXXX XXXXX XXXXXX surpassing XXXXXX's XXXXX knowledge XXX skills. XXXXXXX the human being XXXXX XXXX advanced on XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX chain due XX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XX understanding, XXXX still XXXXX XXXXXX characteristics with XXX animal. XXXXXXX this is the XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX pets in the XXXXX XXXXX; because XXXX relate to animals, as we have XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX (ie; XXXXX, hunger, etc.), XXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX of intellect. People XXX dogs are so intelligent and call them "man's XXXX friend" for XXXX XXXXXX; the XXX acts at a high XXXXX of intellectual XXXXXXXXXXX (in comparison XX a XXXXX or an XXX, XXX say), XXX XXX human XXX read XXX dogs XXXXXXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX can read human XXXXXXXX.</p><p>Thomas XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX off saying XXXX XXX XXXX XX XXXXXXX in every XXXX XX the body, and makes up the body's XXXX. He XXXXXX, "XXX whole XXXX, regarding XXX totality of the soul's perfection XXX XXXXXXX, is in every XXXX XX XXX body. XXX the XXXXX XXXX, XXXXXXXXX the totality XX XXX power, is XXX." (XX. XX) XXXX makes XXXXX because each body part has a specialized function, XXXXX XXXXX XX a XXXX-oiled XXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XXXX XXXXXXX is XXXXXXXXXX is monism, the XXXX XXX body XX one, popular in XXXX XXXXXXXXX doctrines. XXXX XXXXXXXXX can XX contrasted against dualism, XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX the body XXX the soul, which philosopher Rene XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXX that arises from this XX the XXXXXX of XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXX XXX a part of their XXXXX body permanently removed. XXXX XXXXXX XX question the soul; XXX a part of the XXXX removed XXXX XXX body XXXX? Or XXX the XXXX XXXX XX a new form in this XXX body? XXXXX XXX further questions that can be analyzed XXX asked XXXXX XXXX theory XX monism. As a XXXXX, I agree XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX in many ways, particularly his concept of the immaterial soul and his XXXXXXXXXXXX view of XXXXXXXXX. I also recognize that XXXXX XXX XXXXXXX questions XXXX can XX asked XX this topic, XXXXXXXXX the tact-XXXX XX XXX XXXX and the XXXX taking XX XXXXXXXXX body forms.</p><p> <XX></p>">
