Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Answer Questions
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
Essay
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
1</sup> What she is proposing is that despite agreeing for the sake of argument, a fetus is not a person at conception, just like an acorn is not an oak tree. She immediately states that she has no desire to debate specifically on whether a fetus or person or not by claiming, “How precisely, are we supposed to get from there to the conclusion that abortion is morally impermissible?" (p. 188). Her desire here is to broaden the tXXXX, XXXXXX than debate XXXXXXXXXXXX if a XXXXX is a real person at XXXXXXXXXX. For the sake of argument, XXX allows XXX XXXXX to stand and follows XXXX her famous XXXXXXXXX analogy. Thomson XXXXXXXXXX the XXXXXX to imagine they awake XX XXXX they have been kidnapped XX a gang of XXXXX XXXXXX who have plugged a famous XXXXXXXXX into XXXX. XXXX XXX told XXXX it is for a period XX nine months and if XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, the violinist would XXX. XXXXXXX XXXX this analogy XX get her XXXXX XXXXXX to pro-XXXXXX XXX theorize that XXXXXXXX is always XXXXX. The XXXXX that they are always wrong XXXXXX be XXXXXXXXX XXXXX a XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX a fetus, is not given XXX XXXXX XX XXX someone XXXX's body XXXXXXX her XXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXX can XXX that it XX your XXXXX XXXX to stay XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX for the nine months XXXXXXX he has a right to XXXX. In XXXXXXXX to XXXX, I XXXXX Thomas XXXXXX an excellent XXXXX XXXX XXX states, “XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXX XXXX. "XXXXX XXXX. I XXXXX. XXX now you've got XX stay in XXX, XXXX XXX violinist XXXXXXX XXXX you, XXX XXX rest XX your XXXX” (p. XXX). XXXX it seem feasible, or XXXXXX XXX, XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX would allow XXXXXXX else XX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXX them for the remainder of XXXXX XXXX because it is the moral thing to XX? XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX has a XXXXX to life&XXXXXX;XXXXX? </p> <p>An XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX from XXX-XXXX advocates XXXXXX XXXX if a woman is willing XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX and XXXXXXXXXXXXX conceives, XXX right to live belongs XX the fetus XXX not that XX the XXXXXX XX a XXXXXXXXXXX to her XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XX response, XXXXXXX uses the XXXXXXX XX “people-XXXXX” to share how XXXXXXXXX, despite XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX occurs XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX. The reader is asked XX XXXXXXX that people-XXXXX fly XXX around XXX XX XXXX don't XXXX XXXXXXXX they XXXX XXX protective screens that keep XXX XXXXXX-XXXXX out. However, in rare XXXXXXXXX, the XXXXXX-XXXXX find a XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX plant XXXXXXXXXX in the XXXXXX XXX upholstery. XXXXXXX XXXXX the questions, "XXXX the XXXXXX-XXXX XXX XXX develops XXXX a right to XXX use of your house? (p. XXX). The XXXXXXXX XXXXXX seems ludicrous XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX precautions were made to XXXX the people XXXXX out. When comparing it XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX sex, it XXX XX XXXX that XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXX if XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX, then the mother XXXXXX XX expected to XX XXXXXXXXXXX for XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX pregnancies XXXX XXX XXXXX. It does XXX XXXX XXX XXXXX XXX right XX XXX the XXXXXX’s body XXXXXXX it was XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX allowed to be. Contraceptions XXX not full-XXXXX, XX a XXXXXX of fact, the only XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX to avoid XXXXXXXXX, XX XXXXXXXXXX. </p> <p>Thomson XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XX pregnancy due XX a XXXX, XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX is XXXX XXX XXXXX XXX the XXXXX to live, XXXXXXX, they XX not take into consideration that XXXXXXXXX XXX occur in XXXXX scenarios XXXXXXX consensual sex, for instance, XXXX. Thomson XXXXXX, "XXXXXX persons XXXXX XXXXXXXXX is due to XXXX XXXX XX right to XXX use XX their mother's bodies, XXX XXXX that XXXXXXXX XXXX is XXX depriving them of anything they XXXX a right to and XXXXX is XXX XXXXXX killing (p. 195). XXXX XX XXXXX XXXX, XX XXXX the XXXXXX did not give the XXXX any kind of right XX XXX her body, XXXXXXXXX, XXX fetus cannot then in return use the mother’s body, so aborting XXXXX XX considered within the XXXXXX’s XXXXXX. XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX on this XX using XXX analogy XX a burglar XXXXXXXX one’s home XXXXXXX a XXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXXX could XXX that the XXXXXXX XX XXXX to XXXX what he wants XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXX opened XX the homeowner. Obviously, very few, if any would believe XXXX XX be true. If it XXXX, we would XXXX a lot of XXXXX burglars. In another XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX theory, XXXXXXX asks the XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX are XXXXXXXXXXX via rape, XXX XXX only XXX to XXXXX the XXXXX XX XXX her body for a XXXXXX XX XXX XXXX. XXXX would XXX, as XXXXXXX XXXXXX, "...that XXX XXXXX XX XXXXX it to XXXXXX for XXXX hour - XXXX it XXXXX be XXXXXXXX in her XX refuse" (p. 196). XXX opposition XXXX would XXX that aborting the fetus XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXX up XXXXX XX an XXXXXX XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, XXX fact would still remain that the mother did XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX to use her body. </p> <p>I think XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX argument XXXX abortion XX impermissible, even XX XXXXX so can XXXX XXX life XX XXX mother. In XXXXXXXX to XXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX states, "XXXXXXX a woman has become XXXXXXXX, XXX now XXXXXX XXXX XXX has a XXXXXXX condition such XXXX XXX will XXX XX XXX carries the XXXX to term. XXXX may be done for her? XXX XXXXX, being to XXXX, XXX as the XXXXXX XX a XXXXXX XXX, so XXX she a XXXXX XX life” (p. 189). XX XX clear in this scenario XXXX XXXXX XX XXX assumption XXXX everyone has a XXXXX XX XXXX, both XXX mother and XXX fetus have the right XX XXXX. Now XXX XXXXXXXX becomes does XXX mother XXXX a right XX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX abort XXX fetus. Absolutely. I would think XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX extreme XXX-XXXX XXXXXXXXX would XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XX morally XXXXXXXXXX. However, there XXX XXXX who XXXXX say the XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. Thomson XXXXXXXX in the XXXXXXX, "XX are told XXXX performing XXX XXXXXXXX would XX directly XXXXXXX the child, XXXXXXX XXXXX nothing would XXX be killing XXX mother, XXX only letting her XXX. Moreover, in killing XXX XXXXX, XXX XXXXX be XXXXXXX an XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, for XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX no crime, XXX is not aiming at XXX XXXXXX's XXXXX" (p. 190). It is XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXX, but I XXXXX XXXX is XXXXX XXXX out XX XXX XXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX frame XXX allowing the XXXXXX to "XXXX die". X fetus's XXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXXX upon XXX XXXXXX to XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX variables to allow the fetus XX XXXXXX, grow and XXXXXXXXXX XX born. My XXXXXXXX here XX that if XXX XXXXXX XX early in her pregnancy, XXXXX it XXXXX be XXXXXXXXXX for a fetus XX survive outside of XXX XXXXXX, XXX fetus XXXXX XXX XX well. XX XX accept XXXX as it XX or XXXXXX the XXXXXX have the XXXXX to XXXXXXXXX the XXXXX in order that she can XXXX? XXX's XXXXXXX that a XXXXXX XXX already has three XXXXX XXXXXXXX, finds XXXXXXX pregnant but XX XXXX XXXX she will die before XXX fetus XXX reach X XXXXX, does it XXXX morally incorrect that the mother would choose XX abort, not only XX XXXX her own XXXX but XX allow her other children to have their mother? XXXXXXX the mother fully intended on conceiving, XXXX to receive XXX devastating XXXX that having it XXXXX XXXX her. Obviously, it would XXX be an easy XXXXXXXX, XXX it XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XX XXX defense XX the mother’s XXXXX XX live, even XX it means XXXXXXXXXXX a pregnancy she wanted. XXXXXXX further states, “If XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX an innocent XXXXXX XX murder, XXX XXXX XX impermissible, then the mother's XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX person XXXXXX her XX murder, and thus XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX” (p. XXX). She XXXXXXXXX with this XXXXXXX XXXX if a mother performs an abortion on her XXXX in order XX XXXX her XXXX, then it can't be considered murder. In addition, it XX XXX XXXXXXXX XXX the XXXXXX to sit XXX XXXX wait for XXXXX to consume her. </p> <p>In conclusion, I XXXX XX share XXXXXXX’s XXXXXXXX XX XXX begins to XXXXXXXX her argument XX stating, "XXXXX, XXXXX I XX XXXXX that XXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX, I do not XXXXX that it is XXXXXX permissible. There XXX XXXX be XXXXX in XXXXX carrying the child to XXXX requires XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX the mother, XXX XXXX XX a standard we must not XXXX XXXXX" (p. 200). Despite the XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, Thomson XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX she understands XXX opposition's point XX view XXX can XXXXX XX XXXXXXX levels. Her XXXXXXXXX XXXX XX simply XXXXXXX XXXX it XX the XXXXXX's XXXXX to XXXXX, though it XXX XXX XXXXXX be considered XXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XX final XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX is in XXXXX of Thomson's XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX in XXXXX XX rape XXX XXXXX XXX mother's XXXX XX in danger. I am XXX-choice XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX that a woman is granted XXX XXXXX XX do with her body XX she sees XXX. I XXXX XXXXX XXX opposition say XXXX a woman could just give XXX baby up for adoption, rather XXXX XXXXXXX it. Who is to say, XXXXXXX, that XXXXXXXX is the XXXXXX XXXXXX for XXX XXXXX? They may XX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX who XXX XX XXXXXX XX be XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX but XXXXXX intends XX XXXXXXX and XXXXX. XXXXXXX closes with the final statement, "X very early abortion is XXXXXX not XXX XXXXXXX XX a XXXXXX, and so is XXX dealt XXXX XX XXXXXXXX I have XXXX XXXX" (p. XXX). XXX topic of abortion has XXXXXX a XXXXXX XX morals, beliefs and the differences XXXXXXX right and wrong. I XXXXXX, XXXXXXX, who exactly has XXXXXXXXXX what these XXXXXXXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXX XXX is XXX XXX who XXX XXX XXXXX the meanings of XXXXX words, XX argument XX this is that not XXX XXXXXX believe in God, XXXX are XXXX spiritually based with XXXXX own XXXXXXXXXXX of what XX moral. XXX XX it that XXXXXXX which definition is XXXXXXX? </p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
