Toggle navigation
Home
Ask A Question
Answer Questions
Users
Support/FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
need help with an assignment must equal up to 12
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
<p>The information provided in Case Study 4 does not adequately relay enough information about Chief Davis’s leadership or management style within the department, so labeling him as having an “administrative style” or a, “top cop style” would not fit exclusively. Similarly, the “politician style” would not fit because not enough information is given about any of Davis’s subordinate officers who might handle internal situations. I would say that he most definitely utilized the “statesman” executive style because Davis emphasized leadership in both the department and within the community. Though it is not stated how he specifically emphasized leadership within the department, it is mentioned that he had “effective” management skills and one can deduce that his example within the community leads officers to follow suit.<br></p> <p>In Case Study 5, I believe that Chief Fortier’s intentions were good, though he was unsuccessful in his vision, perhaps because of the pre-existing issues that were not resolved before he took over. Because Fortier did not actually play a "leading" role within the department and failed to emphasize leadership in the community, the style of, "top cop" and "statesman" does not apply. The politician style does not really fit either because he seemed to be more focused on recruiting the members of the department to join in the XXXXXXX XX changes. I think XXXXXXX’s style more XXXXXXX fits into the “XXXXXXXXXXXXX” executive style, XXXXXX his efforts were XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXX employees in XXX XXXXXXXXXX. <XX></p> <p>XXXXXXXXXXXXX, I XXXXX XXXXX XXX Fortier XXXXXX XX XXXX a suitable compromise between XXXXX departments and their XXXXXXXXXX communities XXXXXX XXXX were faced with XXXXXXXXX dilemmas. Davis XXX the XXXXXXX of being promoted XXXXXX his XXXXXXXXXX, so he already knew XXX policies, procedures, XXX XXXXX XX set forth by XXX department, XXXXX XXXXXXX was an XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX into XXX unknown XXX XXX met XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX of the department and pressure XXXX the XXXXXXXXX city to make changes.</p> <p>2. XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXX external roles displayed XX both XXXXXX.</p> <p>XX Case Study 4, XXXXX XXXXX was XXXXXXXX within XXX department going XXXX XXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, so he more than likely XXXX how the department was XXX XXX what issues XXXXXX to be addressed. XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX Davis’s external role and his XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX the business XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. More specific, XXX XXX placed a XXXXXXXXXX on interacting XXXX XXX citizens by XXXXXX their officers to XXXXXXXX XXXX the community XXX XXXX XX XXX XX XXXXXX minority officers XX help XXXXX ties with XXXXXX’s increasingly XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, particularly its growing XXXXXXXXX XXXXX community (Cordner, 2016).</p> <p>In Fortier’s case, internally, XXX XXX XXX in dire straits with XXX lack of a XXXXX XXXXXXXXX, needing a XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXX to XXX administrative XXXXXX. XX XXX able to implement updated and XXXXXX systems for XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXX XX search warrants and he was able XX lay XXX foundations for community policing to XXX in XXX XXXXXXX of community XXXXXXXX. XXXXX this XXX a step in XXX right direction, it XXX XXX enough. XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX, the department had XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX comfortable in XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXX the XXX XXX department was being XXX and XXX XXX welcome the XXXXXX that Fortier wanted XX bring. I think XXXXXXX XXXXXXX was ordered by XXXXXX powers to XXXX changes, he XXXXX XX change too much in a XXXXX XXXXXX of time, XXXXXXX the resistance that he was met with. XX XXXXXXXX, there was XXXXXXXXXX because he XXXX XXX lateral hires, XXXXXXXXX XXX immediately XX Deputy XXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX because XXXX XXXXXXXXX felt XXXX were XXXXXX XXXX for a XXXXXXXXX and XXXX that XXXXXXX’s actions XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXX current members of XXX XXXXXXXXXX weren’t XXXX enough. Externally, there XXXX many XX the department XXXXXXX who felt they had a XXXX XXXXXXXX in the XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXX they XXXXXX in XXXXXXXX, “listening” XX XXX community (Cordner, 2016).</p> <p>3. XXXX are the advantages XXX disadvantages of XXXX chief's style as they directly apply to Davis and Fortier?</p> <p>There XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and disadvantages XX XXXX XXXXX’s style XX it XXXXXXXX relates XX XXXX. In XXXX XXXXX X, it XX XXXXX XXXX the LPD XXX a vast amount XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX it came XX communications XXXX its XXXXXXXX. I think because XXXXX Davis took XX XXX “statesman” executive style, he was successfully able XX XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX the community XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX a XXXXXXXX rapport XXXX XXX XXXXX. It XX hard XX say XXXX XXX disadvantages XXXX Chief XXXXX taking XX XXXX XXXXXXXXX style XXXXXXX it XX XXX XXXXXXXXX in XXX case study XXX ramifications XXX department XXXXX XXXXXXX of Davis’s style. XX we XXXXXXX previously, XXX “XXXXXXXXX” executive style XX the rarest XXX most XXXXXX-XXXXX trait and I think XXXXX Davis was able XX XXXXX that XX finding a XXXXXX ground XXXX satisfied XXX XXXXXXXX internally and externally.</p> <p>XX XXXX Study X, Fortier XXXXXX on XXX “XXXXXXXXXXXXXX” executive style, which means he XXXX closely XXXXXXXXXX XXXX a manager rather than an officer. The XXXXXXXXXX XX utilizing this XXXXXXXXX style are that XXXXXXX had XXX foresight to implement modern XXXXXXX for XXX improvement XX XXX XXX XX day functions XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, Fortier XXX not have XXX XXXXXXX of some of XXX XXXXXXXXXX's members which are XXXXXXXX XX XXXX if you expect to be XXXXXXXXXX in XXXX XXXXXX XX XXXX an XXXXXXXXX department XXXX XXX XXXX communication with XXX another and XXX community. I think if Fortier XXXX XX elements of XXX XXXXX executive styles in addition to XXX administrative style, he XXX XXXX fared out a XXXXXX better. I think he XXX XXXXXX into a position, in a department, with a XXXXXXXXXX that was XXXXXXXX XXXXXX both internally XXX XXXXXXXXXX. The XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXX he XXXX’t have XXXX to XXXX with XX XXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX his XXXXXXXXX or XXX subordinates.</p> <p>X. XX you were mayor appointing XXXX XXXX XXXXX and XXXX down XX XXX candidates; Chief Davis and Chief Fortier. Who would you choose XXX why?</p> <p>XX I XXXX XXX XXXXX appointing the next XXXXX, I XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX Davis because XXXXX XXX foremost, I would XXXX a XXXXX XXXX could effectively serve XXX residents in our XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX involvement to ensure XXXX XXX department XXXXX XXX as efficiently XX possible without sacrificing XXX XXXXXXXXX of itself or that of its officers. I believe XXXX Chief Davis XXXXX XX the XXXX adaptable XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX he XX not XXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXXX the XXX and XXX for assistance from XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. XX has proven XXXX XXXX he XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXX, he XXXX fight for it, as he did with XXX location of XXX XXX department. XXXX XXXXX can XX seen XXXX Chief XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX to have XXX XXXXXXXX of XXX new police XXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXXX community. He XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX would XX XXX most good XXXXX XXX XXX XXX best XX convince his XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXX he believed was the XXXXXX XXXXXX (XXXXXXX, XXXX). XXXX XX not to XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX couldn’t do a good job XX XXX Chief of Police, but based on his work during his tenure XX chief in Riverside I would XXXX it difficult XX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXX Chief XXXXX. XXXXXXX, I XXXXX Fortier XXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX that he XXXXXXX XXX not XXXXX for. As XXXXXX in XXX XXXX, XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX deficiencies XXXXX XXXX XXXX related to XXX XXXXXXXXXX’s long-XXXXXXXXXXX philosophy XX management, which many people XXXXXX and outside the XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XX as XXX of “XXXX trust, low XXXXXXX.” XXX basic idea XXX XXXX XXXXXX should XX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX did XXX XXXX XXXX direct supervision and XXXXXXXXX in XXXXX XXXX, whether XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX or indirectly XXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX they created and XXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXX, XXXX). XXXXXXX was brought into XXX XXXXXXXXXX to “change” things, XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX XXX department, he XXX XXX with XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX the XXXXXXX, I think it XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX to XXXXXX.</p> <p>XXXXXXXXX<XX></p> <p>Cordner, X. W. (XXXX). XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (XXX ed.). XXX York: Routledge.<br></p><p><XX></p><p><XXXXXX>Response XX Benjamin. H</XXXXXX> </p> <p>I XXXXX your response XX XXX question XX XX XXXX XXXXXXX XXX thorough and I agree XXXX you that the size XX the department and other factors XXXX a XXXX in the executive style that XXXXX be used. Ideally, a combination of all XXX executive XXXXXX would be most beneficial, XX least in XX XXXXXXX anyway. XX addition, I agree that XXXXXXXX has no place in law XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, I think you are XXXXX to find XXXX form of “office XXXXXXXX” no XXXXXX what type of organization you are XXXXXXXX in and XX XXXXXX whether it XX large or small. XX’s XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXXXXX a fact. XXXXX job XX your XXXXXXXX!<XX></p> <p><strong>XXXXXXXX to Reginald. R</strong></p> <p>I found XXXX response XX the question to be XXXX thought out XXX XXXXXXXXXXX. I agree that as an XXXXXXXXXXXXX you need to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX, but I’m wondering XX XX XXXXXXXX XXX administrative XXXXXXXXX style, you XXXX the respect XX XXXX officers XX putting yourself in a XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX to XX XXXXXXXX to XXXX? XXXX I mean is XXXX XX an XXXXXXXXXXXXX you XXXXX XXXX at XXXXXXXX XXXX as a manager XXXX an XXXXXXX, which in turn XXXXX XXXXX XXXX officers XX XXXX you in XXX same manner. They could possibly XXXX you as someone that XX not on XXXXX side.</p> <p>Similarly, the “XXXXXXXXXX” executive style defends the department XXXX external threats XXX runs the XXXX XX losing XXX XXXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXXX as well. XX I stated in XX XXXXXXXX XX this XXXXXXXX, I XXXXXXXXXX XXXX it XX cliché, XXX some people XXX XXXXX XXXX it comes XX politicians, so officers may feel as XXXXXX they XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX’s main XXXX XX keeping XXXXX politicians XXXXX, XX XXXXX XXXXXXX (XXXXXXX, XXXX). I XXXXX there are a XXX of variables that come into play, so for some departments, XXX executive styles you have chosen XXX XXXX well XXXX. One would XXXX to XXXX into XXXXXXXXXXXXX the XXXX, location, XXX. XXXXXX XXXXX able XX choose a XXXXXXXXXX style to XXXXXX. XXXX job on XXXX XXXXXXXXXX!</p>">
Attachment #1 Preview
Attachment #2 Preview
