X. This XX a tying XXXXXXXXX, because XXX XXXXXXXX is XXXXX XXXXXX XX XXX both Amazon's printing services XXX its bookstore, and XXXXXX freely choose XX use XXX or XXX XXXXX. The XXX of XXXX products in tandem does not XXXXX any XXXXXX benefit which could not XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX purchasing the two XXXXX separately, XXX XXXX it XXXXX a XXXXXXX which XXXXX not XX XXXXXXXX by XXXXX a competitor's goods or services. Rather, XXXXXX XX XXXXXX to leverage XXX market share in XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX in order to illegally increase its XXXXX in XXX print-on-XXXXXX industry (or vice XXXXX, I'm XXX XXX% sure which XXXXXXXX Amazon XX stronger in). That XXXX, the buyer XXX XXXX XXX one XXXXXXX "on the XXXXXXXXX XXXX he or she XXXX XXXXXXXXX a different (or XXXX) product from XXX seller."Consequently, XXXX XX a XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX is XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX antitrust law.
XXXXXXX:
XXXXX://XXX.XXXXXXXXXXX.XXX/XXXXXX/young_lawyers/XXXXXXXXXXXX/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/the_wonderful_world_...