Scoring level
|
Depth and quality of research undertaken
|
Application of research to the task
|
Ability to apply appropriate accounting theories to the context of the task
|
Ability to synthesise information into a coherent and engaging report
|
Ability to correctly acknowledge sources using the RMIT Business Harvard Referencing system
|
Score
|
|
8 marks
|
8 marks
|
8 marks
|
12 marks
|
6marks
|
|
Accomplished
(High Distinction)
|
Materials referred to are relevant andReferences are drawn from a wide variety sources andReferences support the arguments presented andResearch is current and from a reliable source
6-8 marks
|
The report discussion clearly addresses the issues raised in the task andThe report is highly relevant to the needs of the client andThe report clearly outlines the major findings of the investigation and the impact of these findings on the client
6-8 marks
|
Your report makes clear links between your research and current accounting theories andYour report explains these links with clarity and applies these links to the task
6-8 marks
|
The report is professionally presented andAll grammar and punctuation is correct andThe report is written in a style appropriate for the client andThe report is highly engaging and easy to read andAll sections of the report have been included and correctly constructedMinutes of 3 team meetings are included, and correctly constructed
10-12 marks
|
Your team has used the RMIT Business Harvard referencing system to clearly and accurately record all cited sources in the report andYour team has provided a list of references which is correctly formatted in the RMIT Business Harvard style
6 marks
|
|
Highly Competent
(Distinction/
Credit)
|
Most of the materials referred to are relevantReferences are drawn from a good range of sourcesReferences generally support the arguments presentedResearch is mostly current and from a reliable source
5-6 marks
|
-
The report discussion addresses most of the issues raised in the task
-
The report is mostly relevant to the needs of the client
-
The report outlines the major findings of the investigation and the impact of these findings on the client
5 -6marks
|
Your report makes links between your research and current accounting theories but at times these links lack clarityYour report mostly manages to explain these links and apply these links to the task
5-6 marks
|
The report is professionally presentedThe majority of the grammar and punctuation is correctThe report is written in a style appropriate for the clientThe report is engaging and fairly easy to readAll sections of the report have been included and correctly constructedMinutes of 3 team meetings are included, and correctly constructed
8-10 marks
|
Your team has used the RMIT Business Harvard referencing system to clearly and accurately record all cited sources in the reportYour team has provided a list of references which is correctly formatted butSome minor errors in the citations and/or list of references
4marks
|
|
Satisfactory
(Credit/Pass)
|
Some of the materials referred to are relevantReferences are drawn from a limited range of sourcesThere is a lack of cohesion between the references cited and the topic being discussedResearch is mostly current and from a reliable source
4 marks
|
-
The discussion addresses most of the issues raised in the task but lacks some clarity
-
The report at times lacks relevance and/or some of the conclusions drawn are erroneous
-
The report outlines the major findings but lacks clarity in linking these findings to the client’s needs
3-4 marks
|
While some attempts have been made to link accounting theories to your discussion these links lack clarityYour report does not manage to explain these links clearly and apply these links to the task
3-4 marks
|
Improvement is needed in the report presentationThere are some errors in grammar and punctuationThe report is mostly written in a style appropriate for the clientThe report is not engaging and/or is not easy to readAll sections of the report are included but there are some errors in these sectionsMinutes of 3 team meetings are included, but there are some errors in the minutes
4 marks
|
Your team has used the RMIT Business Harvard referencing system to record cited sources in the report but have made some major errors in these citations and/orYour team has provided a list of references but there are errors in the construction of this list
3 marks
|
|
Unsatisfactory
|
There is a lack of evidence of relevant researchThe research presented is too narrowThe research presented does not support the topic
0-2 marks
|
-
The report discussion fails to address most of the issues raised in the task and the discussion lacks clarity
-
The report discussion lacks relevance and/or most of the conclusions drawn are erroneous
-
The report does not outline the major findings
0-2 marks
|
Little or no attempt has been made to link accounting theories to the discussion and /or the links made are incorrectYour report does not manage to explain these links and apply these links to the task
0-2 marks
|
Major improvements in the presentation of the report are neededThere are many errors in grammar and punctuation which need correctionThe report is written in a style that is inappropriate, the report is not engaging and/or is not easy to readNot all sections of the report have been includedMinutes of 3 team meetings are omitted, or there are serious errors in the construction of the minutes
0-2 marks
|
Your team has not used the RMIT Business Harvard system to record cited sources in the report and/orNot all sources are cited and/orNo List of references or serious errors in the construction of this list
0-1 mark
|
|